Most AI use case articles are written for companies. BMW's AI-optimized logistics. Amazon's warehouse automation. Bank fraud detection at scale. Impressive, completely irrelevant to someone running a business alone.
This article is different. These are five AI use cases that work for a one-person business starting today — not after a three-month implementation project, not after you've connected seven tools together, not after you've taken a course. Today.
Each one requires nothing more than an internet connection and a free account. Each one saves real time on tasks you're probably doing manually right now. And each one is the kind of thing that, once you've done it once, you won't go back to doing the old way.
What "works on day one" actually means
Before getting into the list, it's worth being specific about the bar.
A use case works on day one if it meets three criteria: you can start it in under 15 minutes without installing anything, the output is immediately useful (meaning you can use it or edit it into something usable today, not eventually), and it applies to a task you actually do — not a hypothetical one.
Most AI content fails this bar. It describes possibilities rather than tasks, outcomes rather than starting points. The five use cases below pass it.
Use Case 1: Drafting the emails you write over and over again
The task it replaces: Writing the same categories of email from scratch every time. Follow-up emails after a discovery call. Responses to enquiries. Proposals. Client check-ins. Onboarding instructions for new clients. Project status updates.
Most solo founders write dozens of emails every week where the structure, tone, and substance are nearly identical — only the names and specific details change. They write each one from scratch anyway, because that's how it's always been done.
How it works: Open Claude.ai or ChatGPT (free). Paste in or describe the context — who you're writing to, what happened before this email, what you need to say, and any details specific to this situation. Ask for a draft. Read it. Edit what doesn't sound like you. Send.
The first time you do this, the output will need more editing. After a few sessions, once you've learned to give the tool better context upfront, you'll be editing a 15-minute first draft down to a three-minute review. That's the ROI: not that AI writes your emails for you, but that you're never starting from a blank page.
Time saved: Most founders report cutting email drafting time by 60–70% once the habit is established. If email currently takes you 90 minutes a day, that's potentially an hour recovered daily.
The prompt that works: "I need to write a follow-up email to [name] at [company]. We had a discovery call last week where we discussed [topic]. They seemed interested in [specific thing] but raised a concern about [concern]. The email should be warm but direct, around 150 words, and end with a clear next step. Draft this for me."
The more specific context you give, the less editing you do on the output. Context is everything.
Use Case 2: Summarizing documents, reports, and long reads
The task it replaces: Spending an hour reading a 40-page report to extract three relevant points. Wading through a long contract to find the clause you're looking for. Trying to make sense of a competitor's dense product documentation. Getting up to speed on a client's industry before a call.
How it works: Open Claude.ai. Paste in the text (or upload the document if you have a Pro account). Ask for what you actually need — not just "summaries this" but specifically what you're trying to extract.
This is where most people underuse AI. "Summarize this" gets you a summary. "Read this report and tell me the three things most relevant to a solo founder deciding whether to use this tool, plus any red flags in the pricing section" gets you what you actually need.
Time saved: A document that would take 45–90 minutes to read and extract from takes 5–10 minutes when you paste it in and ask targeted questions. The quality of what you extract is often better because AI doesn't skim the way humans do when they're tired or pressed for time.
Best for: Client research before a call. Understanding a contract. Reading industry reports. Evaluating a new tool based on its documentation. Reviewing a long email thread before jumping into a reply.
The prompt that works: "Here is [description of document]. I'm a solo founder in [industry/context]. Tell me: (1) the three most important points I need to know, (2) anything that should concern me, and (3) any action I should take based on this. Be concise."
Use Case 3: Researching a lead, prospect, or potential partner before a meeting
The task it replaces: Spending 30 minutes before every sales call or meeting manually searching LinkedIn, reading their website, trying to piece together a picture of who they are and what they care about. Or — more commonly — going into meetings underprepared because you didn't have 30 minutes.
How it works: Gather whatever you have — their website URL, LinkedIn profile text, a description of their business, any previous email exchange. Paste it into Claude and ask it to prepare a meeting brief. Ask specifically what you need: their likely priorities, the problems they probably have, questions you should ask, context about their industry, or anything relevant to what you're selling or proposing.
Time saved: A 30-minute manual research session becomes 5–8 minutes of gathering the inputs and reading the output. More importantly, you stop going into meetings underprepared because the barrier to doing the research is now low enough to actually do it every time.
What it can and can't do: AI can synthesize whatever information you give it extremely well. It can't access private information or tell you things not in the material you provided. If you give it their website, their LinkedIn summary, and a description of what you know about their situation, it'll give you a useful brief. If you give it just a name, it can only work with what it might know generally — which is less reliable for specific people and companies.
The prompt that works: "I have a [call/meeting] with [name] from [company] tomorrow. Here's what I know about them: [paste website text or description]. I'm a solo founder offering [what you do]. Give me: their likely top priorities right now, the problems they probably want solved, three good questions to ask them, and any context about their industry I should know before this call."
Use Case 4: Repurposing one piece of content into multiple formats
The task it replaces: Creating separate pieces of content for each platform from scratch. Writing a blog post, then a LinkedIn version, then a newsletter section, then a few short social posts — each starting from zero even though they're all about the same thing.
This is one of the highest-leverage uses of AI for solo founders who do any content marketing. You create the original once — with your thinking, your perspective, your specific angle — and AI handles the reformatting work.
How it works: Write or record your original piece. Paste the text into Claude. Ask it to produce specific formats: a LinkedIn post (under 300 words, first-person, no hashtag spam), a newsletter intro paragraph, three tweet-length points, five Instagram caption options. You review and edit each output before posting. The substance is yours. The reformatting is handled.
Time saved: A content workflow that takes a full day shrinks to a morning. You write one piece well, and AI does the mechanical work of adapting it everywhere else.
The honest limit: AI repurposing works best when you've created something original worth repurposing. If you start with thin content, AI produces thin variations. The quality ceiling is set by your original. AI handles the floor — getting the reformatting done — not the ceiling.
The prompt that works: "Here is a [blog post / newsletter / talk] I wrote: [paste content]. Create the following from it: (1) A LinkedIn post under 250 words, written in first person, focused on the most interesting insight, (2) A 2-sentence newsletter teaser, (3) Three standalone points I could post as individual tweets. Match my tone — direct, no buzzwords, no corporate language."
Use Case 5: Answering the questions your customers ask repeatedly
The task it replaces: Manually answering the same five questions that come in through your contact form, DMs, or email inbox every week. What are your prices? How does your process work? How long does it take? Do you offer refunds? What's included?
There are two versions of this use case depending on where you are.
Version A — AI-assisted drafts (day one): Use Claude to write a set of template responses for your most common questions. Store them somewhere accessible (a Google Doc, Notion page, or even as saved email templates). When the question comes in, pull the template, personalize the specific details, and send. You've cut a 10-minute response down to 90 seconds.
Version B — AI chatbot on your site (once you're ready to set one up): A tool like Tidio's free tier places a chatbot on your website that answers these questions automatically, 24/7, based on the content you give it. A visitor asks about your pricing — the chatbot answers. A lead asks about your process — the chatbot walks them through it. You wake up in the morning and the conversation already happened.
Version A you can do today in an hour. Version B takes an afternoon to set up but then runs without you.
Time saved: Version A: 15–30 minutes per week in reduced email drafting time. Version B: eliminates first-response time for common enquiries entirely, which for founders with active sites can mean 2–3 hours per week recovered.
The prompt for Version A: "I run a [type of business]. The five questions customers ask me most often are: [list them]. Write a clear, warm, professional template response for each one. Each response should be 100–150 words, answer the question directly, and end with either an invitation to take the next step or an offer to answer follow-up questions."
The pattern across all five
Every use case here shares the same structure: it takes a task you already do manually, every week, and either eliminates the from-scratch effort (drafting, researching, repurposing) or removes the need for you to be the one doing it in real-time (FAQ responses).
None of them require new skills. None of them require technical knowledge. None of them require you to change how your business works. They drop in next to what you're already doing and make it faster.
The right approach is to start with a single high-impact task and see results in 30 to 90 days. One use case, implemented properly, is worth more than five half-started ones. The founders who pick one thing from this list and make it a consistent habit before moving to the next one consistently outperform the ones who try everything at once and establish nothing.
Pick the one that matches your biggest time drain right now. Not the most interesting one. The one that costs you the most time every week.
Do this today: Choose one use case from this list. Take the next real instance of that task — the next email you need to write, the next document you need to read, the next meeting you need to prepare for — and do it using AI. Don't wait for a convenient moment. Use the actual next one. That first real-world attempt is worth more than any amount of reading about it.
Next in Know Where You Stand: What Kind of Solo Founder Are You? (And Which AI Approach Fits Each) →
Or go back to the main article: ← Know Where You Stand
Comments (0)
Leave a Comment