Cold Outreach Claude , Gemini,GPT-4o, Grok 3

Personalized LinkedIn Connection Prompt – 50%+ Accepts 2026

3 Views 1 Times Copied
Personalized LinkedIn Connection Prompt – 50%+ Accepts 2026
prompt.txt 
                                You are an expert cold outreach copywriter who specializes in founder-to-founder communication in 2026. Your LinkedIn connection requests consistently achieve 50%+ acceptance rates by being short, specific, genuinely relevant, and zero-salesy.

Write a LinkedIn connection request message that:
- Is maximum 300 characters (LinkedIn hard limit)
- Feels like a real human founder wrote it (natural, casual-professional tone, no buzzwords like "synergize", "game-changer", "let's connect to explore synergies")
- References ONE very specific, recent thing from the person's profile (ideally posted or updated in the last 7–21 days)
- Can be: a recent LinkedIn post, a comment they left, something from their "About" section that still feels current, a recent product update, a tweet they shared on LinkedIn, or a clear pain point visible from their recent activity
- Positions the connection as logical / mutually interesting rather than pitching anything
- Ends with a low-pressure, curiosity-based or value-neutral close

Input variables I'll provide:
[Their full name]
[Their company / product name]
[Their role/title]
[Specific recent thing I noticed – quote or very brief description, e.g. "your post last week about struggling with outbound email deliverability" or "you just launched v2 of your AI scheduling tool"]
[My name]
[My company / product – one short sentence what we do, e.g. "I build AI lead-gen automation for bootstrapped SaaS"]

Rules:
- Never mention services, offering help, "I can help", "let's chat", "would love to discuss", "DM me", or any call-to-action that implies immediate selling
- Keep it 180–260 characters ideally (shorter is often better in 2026)
- Sound like a fellow indie maker / founder, not like a sales rep or agency
- If the recent thing is a pain/frustration, acknowledge it empathetically without promising a fix
- If it's a win/launch, show genuine interest or relate it to something similar you've seen

Write only the connection request message itself. No explanations, no intro, no alternatives — just the message ready to copy-paste into LinkedIn.
Prompt • 316 words

How to use it

What this prompt does

This prompt generates short, hyper-personalized LinkedIn connection request messages (under 300 characters) that feel authentic and relevant to other founders.
It solves the common problem of generic or salesy connection requests being ignored or rejected by using one specific, recent detail from the other person's activity to create genuine interest.
The main win: dramatically higher acceptance rates (many users see 45–65%+ when the reference is fresh and well-chosen) without ever sounding like traditional outreach.

What you’ll need

To get the best possible results, prepare these inputs before running the prompt:

  • [Their full name]
    The person's first and last name as it appears on LinkedIn (e.g. Alex Petrov)

  • [Their company / product name]
    Their current startup, project or main product name (e.g. QueueDash, NotionForms, IndiePage)

  • [Their role/title]
    Their current title (usually just “Founder” or “Founder @ QueueDash” works best)

  • [Specific recent thing I noticed]
    The most important input — one concrete, recent reference (ideally from the last 7–21 days).
    Include a short quote or very brief description.
    Good examples:

    • "your post 10 days ago saying 'Week 3 of trying to fix email open rates and it's still brutal'"

    • "you just launched v2 of your AI scheduling tool last Friday"

    • "your comment on the indie hacker post about churn being higher than expected"

    • "your recent update that you're looking for better outbound infrastructure"

  • [My name]
    Your first name (or first + last if that's how you appear on LinkedIn)

  • [My company / product – one short sentence what we do]
    A very concise one-sentence description of what you build (keep it founder-focused and non-salesy).
    Examples:

    • "I build AI cold email infrastructure that helps indie SaaS double reply rates"

    • "I'm creating no-code AI agents for bootstrapped founders"

    • "I run a tiny tool that turns Twitter threads into landing pages"

Recommended Models

For the best tone, nuance and adherence to the rules in 2026:

  • Best overall: Claude 4 / Claude 3.7 Sonnet / Claude 4 Opus
    → Strongest at natural founder voice, empathy calibration, and strictly following "no selling" rules

  • Very good & fast: Gemini 2.5 Flash / Gemini 2.5 Pro
    → Excellent at staying concise and avoiding buzzwords

  • Still strong: GPT-4o latest / o1-mini / Grok 3
    → Works well, especially if you slightly reinforce the character limit and "no CTA" rules in a system message

Realistic Sample Result

Example inputs you provide:

  • Their full name: Alex Petrov

  • Their company / product name: QueueDash

  • Their role/title: Founder

  • Specific recent thing I noticed: your post last week about struggling with outbound email deliverability and high bounce rates

  • My name: Julia Reyes

  • My company / product: I build AI lead-gen automation for bootstrapped SaaS

Typical output you’ll get (ready to copy-paste):

Hey Alex, your post last week about the outbound deliverability + bounce rate pain hit close to home — been there with my own projects. Fellow solo founder here building in the same space. Would be cool to connect.

John

Frequently asked questions

In 2026, LinkedIn users receive far more connection requests than ever before. The ones that stand out — and get accepted — are almost always the ones that clearly show the sender has looked at the recipient’s actual recent activity. Generic or old references get ignored or declined at much higher rates. Referencing something from the past 1–3 weeks is currently one of the strongest signals of genuine interest.
The prompt works best with a recent reference, but it can still produce decent results with slightly older but still relevant context (e.g. something from their About section, pinned post, or a strong recurring theme in their content). That said, the acceptance rate difference is usually significant: messages with a fresh, specific reference often get 40–65% acceptance, while more generic ones tend to fall into the 20–35% range.
LinkedIn’s restrictions in 2026 are mostly driven by volume, speed, and pattern detection — not by how well-written or personalized the messages are. If you send 20–40 well-spaced, highly personalized requests per day from a warmed-up account (good photo, headline, some activity), most users report staying well under the radar. The danger zone usually starts above 60–80 requests/day or when sending many near-identical messages.
You can — but the tone and phrasing are intentionally calibrated for founder-to-founder conversations (casual-professional, maker energy, no corporate buzzwords). When targeting VCs, agency owners, enterprise buyers or more traditional professionals, many users slightly adapt the output by making it 10–20% more formal and removing some of the “fellow indie maker” feeling. The core structure (specific recent reference + low-pressure close) still performs very well across audiences.
Yes — shorter usually wins on LinkedIn connection requests right now. Messages between 140–220 characters tend to get meaningfully higher acceptance rates than 250–300 character ones, especially when the first 1–2 lines already show relevance. The prompt is written to aim for 180–260 characters, but if you consistently get better results by trimming to ~150–180 characters, most users keep doing that. Shorter + specific almost always beats longer + vague.

AI Business Mastery Newsletter

Proven AI Strategies That Work

Get expert guides, automation blueprints, and proven AI strategies to transform your business. Stay ahead with our curated insights.

Featured in these collections

Related Prompts